Keyword and Search-Intent Research
We find what your prospects are actually typing and asking, then map it to your service lines. Topics are chosen because someone is searching for them, not because they sounded good in a meeting.
SEO / AEO gets your site readable. Content is what there is to read. We research what your prospects are actually searching for, write it in your voice, and publish on a cadence that compounds.
Content marketing for financial advisors is the practice of publishing genuinely useful material, usually long-form articles, that answers the questions prospective clients are already asking. Each piece is researched against real search intent, written for a specific reader rather than for a keyword, and optimized so search engines can rank it and AI assistants can quote it. The compounding effect is the point: an article published this quarter keeps earning visits and citations for years, which is what separates it from advertising. It is also the raw material the rest of your marketing runs on, since the same piece feeds your newsletter, your social calendar, and the answer an AI assistant gives when someone asks about your specialty.
Every article covers the same research, writing, and optimization work. You buy the volume that fits your practice.
We find what your prospects are actually typing and asking, then map it to your service lines. Topics are chosen because someone is searching for them, not because they sounded good in a meeting.
Original articles written for your audience and in your voice, not spun from a template library shared with fifty other advisors. Duplicate content is worth less than no content.
A calendar that sequences topics deliberately, so related pieces reinforce each other and build depth in the subjects you want to be known for rather than scattering across unconnected posts.
Titles, meta descriptions, heading structure, internal links, and schema applied to every piece so it is indexable by search engines and quotable by answer engines.
Each article is packaged for the places you already publish, so one piece of research does more than one job.
What each article is producing in analytics, reviewed with you, so the next month's calendar follows the topics that earned attention.
Want to know what this would look like for your practice?
Book a ConsultationA monthly cycle, with your approval before anything publishes.
We identify the questions your prospects are searching, check what already ranks and gets cited, and find the gaps where a better answer would win.
You get the month's topics before anything is written, sequenced so the pieces build on each other rather than standing alone.
We draft in your voice and send it to you. You edit for accuracy and positioning, and anything that needs it goes through your compliance process before publishing.
The piece goes live, fully optimized, and we track what it earns. Results direct the next round of topics.
Content used to be how you climbed the rankings. It is now also how you get quoted. AI assistants build their answers out of material they can parse and attribute, and a practice that has published thoughtful answers to real questions gives them something to work with. A practice that has published nothing gives them a name and a phone number.
It is also the cheapest way to demonstrate judgment rather than assert it. A prospect cannot evaluate your planning process from a services page. They can read how you explain a Roth conversion, or what you tell clients in a down market, and decide whether you think the way they want their advisor to think.
The reason most advisors stop is not that it fails. It is that the second month arrives and the article does not get written, because it was always the thing that got done after everything else. Consistency is the whole mechanism, which is the argument for handing it to someone whose job it is.
more leads
Companies that maintain an active blog generate 67% more leads than those without one.
Source: hostpresto.com
Buy articles by the piece, or get them included in any marketing package. Same research and writing either way.
$150 per article
Articles are yours outright. No contract on the standalone service.
On FinancialAdvisors.com it is $150 per custom article, with no set-up fee and no monthly minimum. It is also included in every marketing package, from one article a month on Essential up to ten on Capstone. Across the wider industry, ghostwritten advisor articles commonly run from around $100 for lightly researched pieces to $1,000 or more for heavily researched long-form work.
One a month, published consistently for a year, beats six a month for two months and then nothing. If you are starting from an empty blog and want to see movement inside six to nine months, three a month is the point where most advisors start noticing it. Beyond that you are buying speed rather than a different outcome.
Like you, and you get the final say before anything publishes. We work from how you already explain things, in your own materials and in conversation, and the draft comes to you to edit. Advisors who send drafts back with real changes get better articles than advisors who approve everything, and the writing gets closer to your voice the longer we do it.
Yes, through yours. Articles are written to go through your review process rather than around it, and the calendar builds in the time for it. Final responsibility for what publishes sits with your compliance review, as it should.
This is the slowest channel here and the one with the longest tail. Expect indexing within weeks, meaningful search traffic in month four to nine, and inquiries attributable to a specific article after that. What arrives sooner is the credibility effect on people already considering you, since prospects who are looking you up read what you have written regardless of how it ranks.
Yes, outright. They are written for you, they publish under your name, and they stay yours whether or not you keep buying them.
The research and drafting use modern tools, and the finished article is edited, fact-checked, and shaped by a person before it reaches you. Pure generated content tends to read as generic, which is the opposite of the point, and search engines are increasingly good at recognizing it. What you are paying for is the research behind the topic and the judgment in the edit.
Often worth updating rather than replacing. An older piece that already ranks has history that a new one does not, and refreshing it is usually the cheaper path to more traffic. We will tell you when that is the better use of the budget.
Book a call and we will map out what your practice actually needs first.